Trump Administration Defends Firing of Labor Stats Chief Amid Economic Turmoil

Related

India-US Trade Deal Signals Reset in Bilateral Economic Ties

India and the United States have announced a major...

US to Host Global Talks on Critical Minerals Alliance to Secure Supply Chains

Around 20 countries, including major G7 economies, will...

European Parliament Postpones Decision on EU–US Trade Deal

The European Parliament has postponed its decision on whether...

Severe Winter Storm Kills at Least 30 Across US, 200 Million Under Cold Alerts

A powerful winter storm sweeping across the United States...

Following a week of disappointing job growth and economic data, the Trump administration is under fire for dismissing Labor Statistics Commissioner Erika McEntarfer. Officials defended the move, saying the president had “real concerns” about job figures and reserved the right to appoint individuals who align with his vision for economic management.
The U.S. economy added just 73,000 jobs in July—far below expectations—and downward revisions for previous months totaled 285,000. The administration’s explanation focused on the accuracy and consistency of labor data. “You want reliable numbers,” said Trade Representative Jamieson Greer, backing Trump’s decision to replace McEntarfer.
Critics, however, argue that the firing undermines confidence in the independence and credibility of U.S. economic data. Former officials and economists warned that politicizing federal agencies like the Bureau of Labor Statistics could erode public trust in official statistics and data-driven governance.
This controversy unfolds alongside the implementation of new tariffs, which economists warn may dampen growth. Administration officials insist the new tariff rates are “locked in,” despite previous delays and ongoing criticism from Wall Street and global partners.
Former Treasury Secretary Larry Summers called the firing “beyond anything Nixon ever did,” linking it to a broader pattern of pressure on independent institutions. He said the move signals a dangerous drift toward authoritarianism, warning that dismissing statisticians and threatening public institutions sets a troubling precedent.