A critical blind spot in the US-Russia energy talks is the global energy transition. A deal that prolongs the world’s reliance on Russian fossil fuels could undermine long-term climate goals and contradict stated US policy on clean energy.
A move to help Russia develop its LNG capacity, such as in the Arctic, or to bring Exxon Mobil’s expertise back to a massive oil project like Sakhalin-1, would lock in decades of future carbon emissions. This runs counter to the global scientific consensus on the need to phase out fossil fuels.
While the Trump administration has been skeptical of climate action, other parts of the US government and many of its key allies are strongly committed to the energy transition. A deal that bolsters Russia’s position as a top fossil fuel producer would be seen as a major step backward.
The pursuit of a short-term peace deal is therefore clashing with the long-term imperative of addressing climate change. By focusing solely on the immediate geopolitical chess game, the US risks making a decision that will have negative consequences for the planet for generations to come.