The European Parliament has taken decisive action by suspending the US trade agreement ratification process in response to President Trump’s threat of 10% tariffs conditional on European support for his Greenland acquisition. This move represents the most concrete material response Brussels has demonstrated against what European leaders have termed blackmail.
Trade committee chairman Bernd Lange established firm boundaries for future negotiations, declaring that threats involving Greenland must end before any possibility of compromise exists on the trade deal. The suspended agreement had promised to revolutionize American exports to Europe by establishing zero-percent tariffs on many industrial products.
Despite the trade deal freeze, the EU’s commitment to purchase $750 billion in American energy remains fully intact. Lange confirmed this energy arrangement operates independently from the tariff negotiations, allowing Brussels to preserve energy cooperation while taking a principled stand.
The diplomatic breakdown manifested when European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen altered her travel itinerary, returning to Brussels for emergency summit preparations.
European officials’ frank acknowledgment that consumers might face higher costs or restricted access to American services demonstrates resolve to accept domestic political consequences for principled positions. Rather than hiding potential consumer impacts, this candor suggests Brussels has calculated that public support for defending sovereignty outweighs consumer preferences for cheaper goods or unrestricted American services. The willingness to acknowledge these costs upfront indicates serious commitment to deploying powerful countermeasures including €93 billion in tariffs and potential market access restrictions for US companies.
